Rendered at 05:04:01 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Cloudflare Workers.
dylan604 12 hours ago [-]
"Ease of carrying the telescope with bag straps"
I like this, but...
Some of the best telescope buying advice I was ever given was to only buy a scope as big as you can carry/setup by yourself. It's hard to find time in one's schedule to take a scope somewhere, but it can be next to impossible to align schedules with another person. At least for a scope meant to take somewhere. Most people don't have a permanent setup though, so it's a pretty decent thing to consider.
The weight is only part of the equation, but also consider if it takes more than two hands to assemble.
Wallace is built, but Gromit, a 16.5” F/3, is under progress. Working on the mirror and CAD :)
shamaz65 19 hours ago [-]
I have no idea that it is possible to 3D print telescopes. Is this less expensive?
BadJo0Jo0 14 hours ago [-]
The question probably shouldn't be "is it less expensive" but "is it a better value".
The general sentiment behind these 3d printed telescopes are that you'd generally get better quality and potentially better QoL features at the same cost of buying some commercially available options.
From the Hadley project
>The mission here is to make an attractive alternative to the shoddy, hard to use "hobby-killer" scopes in the $100-200 range.
muyuu 12 hours ago [-]
Yep, my experience is that cheaper scopes are so shoddy I've regretted giving them away.
labcomputer 7 hours ago [-]
It’s not really the telescope you’re printing, but some custom fittings to assemble metal rods into a telescope.
People have been making telescopes with this method before 3D printing existed. They just used something else for all the little dodads.
archerjax 12 hours ago [-]
Where would one go to learn about/find resources on the types of 3d printers best used for a telescope project like this?
Apparently a 6" primary one. There's also a secondary one as well. /s
Zardoz84 19 hours ago [-]
I need to build a Dobson mount for my old homemade 8" F 5.5 Newton ... Why doesnt have a mount ? Well, it had 2 mounts in the past. It was built by my father, and we moved to another house, we need to ditch the mount. I managed to save the tube and the parts, and lately built an adapter to be attached to an EQ6 mount that I was allowed to use with a university astronomical association.
I like this, but...
Some of the best telescope buying advice I was ever given was to only buy a scope as big as you can carry/setup by yourself. It's hard to find time in one's schedule to take a scope somewhere, but it can be next to impossible to align schedules with another person. At least for a scope meant to take somewhere. Most people don't have a permanent setup though, so it's a pretty decent thing to consider.
The weight is only part of the equation, but also consider if it takes more than two hands to assemble.
https://www.printables.com/model/1325533-smallest-telescope-...
Wallace, my 6” f/2.8 :
https://www.printables.com/model/997327-wallace-6-f28-telesc...
And my tiny but mighty 3” f/4 : https://www.printables.com/model/1475113-76300-pocket-dobson
Wallace is built, but Gromit, a 16.5” F/3, is under progress. Working on the mirror and CAD :)
The general sentiment behind these 3d printed telescopes are that you'd generally get better quality and potentially better QoL features at the same cost of buying some commercially available options.
From the Hadley project
>The mission here is to make an attractive alternative to the shoddy, hard to use "hobby-killer" scopes in the $100-200 range.
People have been making telescopes with this method before 3D printing existed. They just used something else for all the little dodads.